Asia
Catalyst's recent
report vividly depicted the barriers Chinese kids face to getting AIDS
treatment that they need to survive. One key problem is that powerful
U.S.-based pharmaceutical companies have made some AIDS drugs extraordinarily
expensive - including both second-line drugs that are essential for those who
have built up resistance to the first line of AIDS medication, and pediatric
medicines. The U.S.
government has, until now, backed the pharmaceutical companies in their campaign
to penalize countries that dare to invoke their rights to produce these
medicines without patents. It is time for the U.S. government and big pharma to
get out of the way and allow developing countries to give their citizens the
life-saving drugs they desperately need.
On April 28, Asia Catalyst hosted a panel at NYU School of Law on pediatric AIDS in China featuring Meg Davis, Lauren Burke, Joanne Csete and Ken Legins, and moderated by Jerome A. Cohen. The panel also announced the launching of our report I Will Fight to My Last Breath: Barriers to AIDS Treatment for Children in China.
Remarks by Joanne Csete at launching of Asia Catalyst's report I Will Fight to My Last Breath: Barriers to AIDS Treatment in China onApril 28, 2009.
I would like to offer these remarks in honor of our
colleague Mr Hu Jia who is currently in a Chinese prison partly because he
exercised his freedom of speech in the form of bold advocacy on behalf of
people living with HIV in China.I am also deeply honored to be in the
presence of Mr Li Dan and Ms. Shen Tingting and to acknowledge their pioneering
work on behalf of people living with HIV.
I congratulate Asia Catalyst on the hard work that went into
the production of this very useful report and especially for reminding us that
addressing HIV in any population means addressing a wide range of human rights
and human rights abuses.
We are in a moment in the global health world when there are
many powerful interests making the case that the world has focused too much on
HIV, that HIV has been treated as too "special" and has received too much money
and attention, and that we need to make our response to HIV more like the
response to other health problems.My
reaction when I hear this is that this line of argument opens the door for
those who would push us back to the time when all global health problems were
horribly underfunded and neglected.Why
are we not all pushing for every health problem and for health systems
challenges to attract the kind of funding that HIV/AIDS has attracted, rather
than for HIV to be pushed back into the "normalcy" of other problems?